Mid-Atlantic

When you were borne your parents signed an application for birth certificate, this “Certificate of Live Birth” was filed and certified in the state and a copy to treasury and the IMF.

At this point a ceste que trust was created for you and from then on you were known as JOHN ADAM JONES, instead of John Adam Jones.

The reason for the creation of this trust is because the United States, the State you live in, the courts and all government agencies are corporations. They cannot deal with living breathing people, only other fictitious entities. Therefore, they created a Trust JOHN ADAM JONES, a fictitious entity they could deal with. But, all fictitious entities must have people act for them, and people to be liable, that’s where you, John Adam Jones come in, you are the surety for this entity and the liable party.

When you deal in money you are using Federal Reserve Notes, which are not money, but are credit, or debt instruments, these notes are the property of the Federal Reserve, as long as you use them you will always be subject to their jurisdiction and liable for the IRS income tax. In addition you are giving up your sovereignty by the use of these instruments because only JOHN ADAM JONES has the right to use tem, so when you use FRN’S, you are acting as JOHN ADAM JONES, in the public, and not John Adam Jones in the private.

When Congress borrows money on the credit of the United States, bonds are thus legislated into existence and deposited as credit entries in Federal Reserve banks. United States bonds, bills and notes constitute money as affirmed by the Supreme Court (Legal Tender Cases, 110 U.S. 421), and this money when deposited with the Fed becomes collateral from whence the Treasury may write checks against the credit thus created in its account (12 USC 391). For example, suppose Congress appropriates an expenditure of $1 billion.

To finance the appropriation Congress creates the $1 billion worth of bonds out of thin air and deposits it with the privately owned Federal Reserve System. Upon receiving the bonds, the Fed credits $1 billion to the Treasury's checking account, holding the deposited bonds as collateral. When the United States deposits its bonds with the Federal Reserve System, private credit is extended to the Treasury by the Fed. Under its power to borrow money, Congress is authorized by the Constitution to contract debt, and whenever something is borrowed it must be returned. When Congress spends the contracted private credit, each use of credit is debt which must be returned to the lender or Fed. Since Congress authorizes the expenditure of this private credit, the United States incurs the primary obligation to return the borrowed credit, creating a National Debt which results when credit is not returned.

However, if anyone else accepts this private credit and uses it to purchase goods and services, the user voluntarily incurs the obligation requiring him to make a return of income whereby a portion of the income is collected by the IRS and delivered to the
Federal Reserve banksters.

Actually the federal income tax imparts two separate obligations: the obligation to file a return and the obligation to abide by the Internal Revenue Code. The obligation to make a return of income for using private credit is recognized in law as an irrecusable obligation, which according to 'Bouvier's Law Dictionary' (1914 ed.), is "a term used to indicate a certain class of contractual obligations recognized by the law which are imposed upon a person without his consent and without regard to any act of his own."

This is distinguished from a recusable obligation which, according to Bouvier, arises from a voluntary act by which one incurs the obligation imposed by the operation of law. The voluntary use of private credit is the condition precedent which imposes the irrecusable obligation to file a tax return. If private credit is not used or rejected, then the operation of law which imposes the irrecusable obligation lies dormant and cannot apply.

In 'Brushaber v. Union Pacific RR Co.' 240 U.S. 1 (1916), the Supreme Court affirmed that the federal income tax is in the class of indirect taxes, which include duties and excises. The personal income tax arises from a duty -- i.e., charge or fee -- which is voluntarily incurred and subject to the rule of uniformity. A charge is a duty or obligation, binding upon him who enters into it, which may be removed or taken away by a discharge (performance): 'Bouvier', p. 459.

Our federal personal income tax is not really a tax in the ordinary sense of the word but rather a burden or obligation which the taxpayer voluntarily assumes, and the burden of the tax falls upon those who voluntarily use private credit. Simply stated the tax imposed is a charge or fee upon the use of private credit where the amount of private credit used measures the pecuniary obligation.

It is the VOLUNTARY use of private credit which imposes upon the user the quasi contractual or implied obligation to make a return of income. In 'Pollock v. Farmer's Loan & Trust Co.' 158 U.S. 601 (1895) the Supreme Court had declared the income tax of 1894 to be repugnant to the Constitution, holding that taxation of rents, wages and salaries must conform to the rule of apportionment.

However, when this decision was rendered, there was no privately owned central bank issuing private credit and currency but rather public money in the form of legal tender notes and coins of the United States circulated. Public money is the lawful money of the United States which the Constitution authorizes Congress to issue, conferring a property right, whereas the private credit issued by the Fed is neither money nor property, permitting the user an equitable
 interest but denying allodial title.

Today, we have two competing monetary systems, the Federal Reserve System, with its private credit and currency, and the public money system consisting of legal tender United States notes and coins.

One could use the public money system, paying all bills with coins and United States notes (if the notes can be obtained), or one could voluntarily use the private credit system and thereby incur the obligation to make a return of income. Under 26 USC 7609 the IRS has carte blanche authority to summon and investigate bank records for the purpose of determining tax liabilities or discovering unknown taxpayers: 'United States v. Berg' 636 F.2d 203 (1980).

A major purpose behind the 16th Amendment was to give Congress authority to enforce private law collections of revenue. Congress had the plenary power to collect income taxes arising from government granted privileges long before the 16th Amendment was ratified, and the amendment was unnecessary, except to give Congress the added power to enforce collections under private law: i.e., income from whatever source.

So, what is the point we are getting at here and where does the PTO come in. how do I stop using FRN’S?
The idea is to operate your life as a Trustee and not as the “Straw man” i.e. “JOHN ADAM JONES”. To do this, you operate through PTO’S and all checking accounts and FRN’S you use belong to the PTO not you. You sign the checks as Trustee, always with a qualified signature. You have no FRN’S, no accounts with banks, the PTO’S have those accounts, you are the Trustee and not liable.
You keep a separate wallet with your checks and FRN’S in it and on the front of that wallet is printed, “Private Property of “ABC Holding”. And, you always have on your person at least $21 in silver coins. (Silver Eagles are good).

DISCLAIMER

NONE OF THE ABOVE IS ADVOCATING OR ADVISING NOT TO FILE TAX RETURNS OR PAY TAX ON TAXABLE INCOME OR TO HIDE OR LAUNDER MONEY FROM TAXATION, MID-ATLANTIC CONCURS THAT INCOME TAX IS DUE AND FILING REQUIRED ON TAXABLE INCOME RECEIVED BY TAXPAYERS. 

THE ABOVE IS ALSO NOT LEGAL ADVICE OR A QUALIFIED LEGAL OPINION BUT THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.